Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by grandempire on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:09AM
(#43220670)
I think it’s pretty hard to show an employee is not acting in an official duty in regards to work material. I don’t think this is a sound legal opinion.
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:16AM
(#43220759)
> it’s pretty hard to show an employee is not acting in an official duty
Not if they’re violating a court order without executive privilege.
Wick officially works for the USDS and CFPB. If Bessent and Trump haven’t given a clear order to violate the law, his actions cease to be on behalf of the United States but instead enacted in his personal capacity. Similar to a park ranger walking into a military base and trying to run off with some kit.
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by grandempire on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:14PM
(#43222595)
Interesting theory, lets check back next year.
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:43PM
(#43222891)
Nothing happens until after 2026.
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by iwontberude on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:14AM
(#43220733)
Counter: Especially when they can decide without any resistance from the judicial branch who is an officer, an official, etc. They interpret all laws as being friendly to them and ignore the contradictions when it suits them. This isn’t rule of law and you know it. Sound legal opinions don’t mean shit now.
“Official duties” is load bearing in this sentence.
If the work is found to have been improperly authorised, this DOGE bro is acting in his personal capacity. That means personal liability for his actions and lawbreaking.