Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by werrett on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:36AM (#43218657)

Not to go too much on an AusPol tangent, LNP Nuclear stuff is more about delaying the green-power transition.

It keeps coal / gas power around for a nuclear future that is decades away at best (and never more likely). It’s a sop to the oil and mining companies. https://youtube.com/watch?v=JBqVVBUdW84

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by jiggawatts on Saturday March 01, 2025 @08:16AM (#43218940)

That is probably 75% of the reason, but it does dovetail very nicely with the acquisition of nuclear submarines with nuclear weapons capabilities.

I thought I was just imagining things, but I looked it up and it turns out that the Liberal party has been flirting with arming Australia with nukes since the 1990s or maybe the late 80s.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by ovi256 on Saturday March 01, 2025 @09:08AM (#43219375)

The planned AUKUS submarines have no nuclear weapon capabilities. They're nuclear powered attack submarines that use conventional weapons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSN-AUKUS

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by 15155 on Saturday March 01, 2025 @10:35AM (#43220258)

> In January 2023, it was reported that the submarines were likely to incorporate a vertical launch system (VLS) for land-attack missiles. This would be a first for Royal Navy SSNs, which currently launch land-attack missiles via their torpedo tubes. A VLS system was described as likely to increase interoperability options with the US Navy since future US land attack missiles may not have a horizontal launch option.

The Tomahawk and basically every similar cruise missile can easily be outfitted with any warhead. SLBMs aren't the only delivery platform.

[ Parent | on HN ]