Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by echoangle on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:20AM
(#43218542)
NATO didn’t agree to not expand, some ministers of some member countries verbally said that NATO wouldn’t expand. It’s not like there was a treaty that was signed and then ignored.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by gitaarik on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:27AM
(#43218587)
Well I guess that for Russia it doesn't really matter if the agreement was official. They still feel threatened by it, and they have been saying that, and NATO still went on.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by echoangle on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:28AM
(#43218600)
Ok, so then it’s fine? I know what happened, we were discussing if it’s acceptable though.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by gitaarik on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:39AM
(#43218677)
Then what is fine? To expand NATO? Maybe it's not fine if it causes WW3