Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by zqna on Friday February 28, 2025 @08:03PM (#43214290)

5. Ukraine develops nukes ASAP. That's the only viable strategy thar protects (protected so far).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by postalrat on Friday February 28, 2025 @09:42PM (#43215120)

At what point would ukraine be justified launching their nukes (if they had them)? Now? After russian launches first?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by cloverich on Friday February 28, 2025 @11:12PM (#43215793)

Whenever they want, up until Russia officially backs down.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by postalrat on Monday March 03, 2025 @09:38AM (#43242141)

So when is russia justified to launch its nukes? Simply "whenever they want?"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by cryptonector on Friday February 28, 2025 @11:51PM (#43216049)

Sure, and Russia wouldn't nuke NATO targets in return. And they wouldn't know of Ukraine's nuclear weapons program and destroy it before it succeeds.

This sort of gullibility is very dangerous, especially if it manifests in folks in DC who could help your scenario happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by zqna on Saturday March 01, 2025 @04:45AM (#43217690)

If your goal is not to be annihilated in the shirt term, you don't care what they are thinking in DC, Moscow, even London

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting by Aaargh20318 on Saturday March 01, 2025 @08:45AM (#43219170)

> Sure, and Russia wouldn't nuke NATO targets in return.

With what? Left over nukes from the cold war that haven't been maintained in decades? I would be surprised if Russia had 1 working nuke left.

[ Parent | on HN ]