News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Launch HN: Maritime Fusion (YC W25) – Fusion Reactors for... by rnhmjoj on Thursday February 27, 2025 @03:41AM (#43192460)
Yes, tritium is radioactive but it has to be recycled and reused to continuously fuel the reactor. Every part of a fusion reactor is designed to minimise the retention of tritium, the actual radioactive waste will be materials activated by neutron radiation (neutrons are captured by nuclei, transmute the element into a radioactive one which then decays to a stable isotope emitting more radiation).

A small fusion reactor, being a powerful neutron source, will be a great risk for proliferation. It should be able to breed plutonium for nuclear weapons as much as it can breed tritium.

Re:Launch HN: Maritime Fusion (YC W25) – Fusion Reactors for... by sandworm101 on Thursday February 27, 2025 @04:56AM (#43192840)
Which is why in "fusion" bombs the majority of energy still comes from fission. The fusion reaction is a neutron source to boost the efficiency of the fission reaction. A pure fusion bomb, if one could ever trigger such a thing without fission, would not be very efficient.
Re:Launch HN: Maritime Fusion (YC W25) – Fusion Reactors for... by coldburst on Thursday February 27, 2025 @07:38AM (#43193839)
For "boosted fission" and early thermonuclear bomb designs yes, but not so for the more evolved thermonuclear designs. Navajo (Operation Redwing, 1956) was 95% fusion, Tsar bomba (1961) was 97% fusion, Housatonic (Operation Dominic, 1962) was 99.9% fusion.