Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Experimentation is gone

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by bruce511 on Monday February 24, 2025 @11:12PM (#43168102)

I buy the gerrymandering concept at the congressional level.

But Trump won the popular vote. He increased his numbers in 90% of counties. He grew across all demographics.

This was not a structural failure. It was very clearly a country-wide mandate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by toast0 on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @12:48AM (#43168616)

He clearly won, but a narrow victory is not a mandate.

1984 Reagan's victory was a mandate https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_United_States_president...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by watwut on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @02:04AM (#43169065)

Small victory is not country wife mandate. And also, frankly, I can't imagine you are conservatives saying the same if Hareis was in power.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by kelnos on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @06:50AM (#43170761)

Ugh, please stop calling this a "mandate". You don't have a mandate when you weren't even able to secure 50% of the total votes, and your main opponent only trailed you by a percentage point and a half.

I think if Biden had decided up-front that he wouldn't seek re-election, and the Democrats had been able to field a real primary, Trump may not have won. Instead we had an old man making blunder after blunder during his campaign, followed by a not-all-that-popular replacement that no one selected through the primary process, who only had a few short months to put a campaign together. Frankly I think it's impressive Harris did as well as she did.

"Mandate"... oh, please.

[ Parent | on HN ]