Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
by justinbaker84 on Monday February 24, 2025 @04:45PM
(#43165318)
This is the main point I always want to communicate to the teams building foundation models.
A lot of people just want the ability to pay more in order to get more.
I would gladly pay 10x more to get relatively modest increases in performance. That is how important the intelligence is.
Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
by willsmith72 on Monday February 24, 2025 @06:21PM
(#43166135)
As a growth company, they likely would prefer a larger amount of users even with occasional rate limits, vs smaller pool of power users.
As long as capacity is an issue, you can't have both
Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code
by cruffle_duffle on Monday February 24, 2025 @08:17PM
(#43166920)
If people are paying for use, then why can’t you have both?
It takes time to grow capacity to meet growing revenue/usage. As parent is saying, if you are in a growth market at time T with capacity X, you would rather have more people using it even if that means they can each use less.
And I'm also sure that you're working on it, but some kind of auto-summarization of facts to reduce the context in order to avoid penalizing long threads would be sweet.
I don't know if your internal users are dogfooding the product that has user limits, so you may not have had this feedback - it makes me irritable/stressed to know that I'm running up close to the limit without having gotten to the bottom of a bug. I don't think stress response in your users is a desirable thing :).