Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security...
by badmintonbaseba on Monday February 24, 2025 @12:10PM
(#43162024)
I think it was downplayed even more. Supposedly the initial email by the researcher only had evidence for leaking database sizes, and I think it's likely that the CEO only got confirmation for this evidence internally and nothing more.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security...
by JayeLTee on Monday February 24, 2025 @12:39PM
(#43162410)
Although I say:
"This server contains over 3,8GB of data exposed including the logins for 16,500 of your users and a lot of PII and credentials, you need to secure access to the server as soon as possible."
After all that transpired after etc I believe it's possible someone downplayed the severity of this to the CEO and he took that as an opportunity to ignore everything I wrote on the emails and reply that way to me assuming I was some cybersecurity vendor working for "Proton" trying to push something for the company to buy.