News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security... by mind-blight on Monday February 24, 2025 @11:36AM (#43161513)
I thoroughly enjoyed the post and thought your tone was appropriate, entertaining, and kind of kethartic. You didn't call them names, engage in ad hominem, or do anything click-batey. You were understandably irritated at how they talked to you and how they were clearly trying to hide a massive exposure from their users. And then you shredded them with data.

A+ - And thanks for trying to keep folks like this honest!

Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security... by oskarkk on Monday February 24, 2025 @12:11PM (#43162054)
> You didn't call them names, engage in ad hominem

Well, the author wrote:

> Teammate App CEO, Sean Banayan, who has the reading comprehension and IT knowledge of a toddler

So it wasn't very nice, but deserved imo.

Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security... by mind-blight on Monday February 24, 2025 @01:57PM (#43163382)
Fair - maybe there was a little name calling. But, I agree it was deserved.
Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security... by behringer on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @09:40AM (#43172437)
To be fair that doesn't appear to be an ad hominem because the author lists many facts supporting his assertion none of which was particularly personal. Nor is it name calling as he compared the CEO to a toddler, but did not say that he was a toddler.
Re:'Impossible-to-Hack' Security Turns Out to Be No Security... by Arn_Thor on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @01:43AM (#43168938)
(*cathartic)