Re:Why Clojure?
by sundarurfriend on Monday February 24, 2025 @02:46AM
(#43156819)
I was gonna reply something similar too. The only "counters" people have when talking about Clojure (that I see, as a non-Clojurian) are pretty weak, and are usually: "it uses JVM, and JVM bad mmmkay" and the typical lazy dismissal of Lisps as "omg it's parantheses everywhere".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Clojure?
by worthless-trash on Monday February 24, 2025 @08:20AM
(#43159220)
My new favourite is am seeing is clojure doesnt have enough syntactic sugar.
SMH.