News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Clojure? by sundarurfriend on Monday February 24, 2025 @02:46AM (#43156819)
I was gonna reply something similar too. The only "counters" people have when talking about Clojure (that I see, as a non-Clojurian) are pretty weak, and are usually: "it uses JVM, and JVM bad mmmkay" and the typical lazy dismissal of Lisps as "omg it's parantheses everywhere".
Re:Why Clojure? by worthless-trash on Monday February 24, 2025 @08:20AM (#43159220)
My new favourite is am seeing is clojure doesnt have enough syntactic sugar.

SMH.

Re:Why Clojure? by maleldil on Monday February 24, 2025 @09:29AM (#43159934)
Add "dynamic language" in this day and age where everyone thinks static languages are cool again.