Re:DOGE employees don't understand the basics of SQL
by gs17 on Thursday February 20, 2025 @11:22PM
(#43124009)
That whole thing was debunked AFAIK. Well, it kind of self-debunked since the original tweet that was posted as a reply to said "over 150 years old", not "exactly slightly under 150 years old", and "a number in ISO8601 format", but see e.g.: https://iter.ca/post/1875-epoch/
DOGE has plenty of ways to demonstrate ineptitude without us making some new ones up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DOGE employees don't understand the basics of SQL
by JohnTHaller on Thursday February 20, 2025 @11:26PM
(#43124030)
It was debunked, but to show Elon's bucket list was also poorly compiled by folks who don't understand the database they are pulling from: https://x.com/justinwolfers/status/1891678450487841007