Agree. RabbitMQ is a Swiss Army knife that has a lot of available patterns, scales fairly well, and is very robust. If you don’t know what to choose, start with Rabbit. It will let you figure out which patterns you need and you probably won’t scale out of it. Pay someone to host it.
On the other hand, if you know what you need to do and it’s supported by it, NATS is IME the way to go (particularly JetStream).
Re:Kafka at the Low End
by rcombatwombat on Monday February 24, 2025 @02:26PM
(#43163783)
IMHO NATS is an even better Swiss army knife than Rabbit
RabbitMQ/Erlang on OTP is probably one of the most solid solutions I've deployed over the years (low service cycle demands.) Highly recommended with the AMQP SSL credential certs, and GUID approach to application layer load-balancing. Cut our operational costs around 37 times lower than traditional load-balancer approaches. =3