News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I Canceled My CO2stats Account by gravitycop on Monday January 12, 2009 @12:58PM (#430805)
Clearer skies should be part of a cost benefit analysis.

External costs of coal have been quantified by ExternE.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf68.html

The report of ExternE, a major European study of the external costs of various fuel cycles, focusing on coal and nuclear, was released in 2001 [...] The external costs are defined as those actually incurred in relation to health and the environment and quantifiable but not built into the cost of the electricity to the consumer and therefore which are borne by society at large. They include particularly the effects of air pollution on human health, crop yields and buildings, as well as occupational disease and accidents. [...] The report shows that in clear cash terms nuclear energy incurs about one tenth of the costs of coal. Nuclear energy averages under 0.4 euro cents/kWh (0.2-0.7), less than hydro, coal is over 4.0 cents (2-10 cent averages in different countries), gas ranges 1-4 cents and only wind shows up better than nuclear, at 0.05-0.25 cents/kWh average.

The EU cost of electricity generation without these external costs averages about 4 cents/kWh. If these external costs were in fact included, the EU price of electricity from coal would double and that from gas would increase around 30%. A summary plus access to more recent work is on ExternE web site. http://www.externe.info

Re:Why I Canceled My CO2stats Account by anewaccountname on Monday January 12, 2009 @08:24PM (#431460)
If nuclear is so cheap and has such few externalities, how did we wind up with the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act?
Re:Why I Canceled My CO2stats Account by gravitycop on Tuesday January 13, 2009 @03:45AM (#431822)
Nuclear was easy to sue.