Wouldn’t interpreting the EO as setting limits on the private sector be government overreach?
https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/maryland-ag-dei-presi...
It seems like this part is the relevant part:
> [The executive order] also instructs the U.S. attorney general to create a plan that would deter the private sector from continuing DEI programs.
So while it is not technically illegal yet, seems like they are getting ahead of that issue before it may arise based on pretty strong signaling that it will
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic here, but even if so: This phrasing is too close to just spreading a pro-Trump lie outright.
Better to say that companies are avoiding these policies because a wannabe dictator has thrown a hissy fit about them while CCing everyone on the email.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Kershaw#%22Working_Towards...