Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by veggieroll on Sunday February 16, 2025 @03:46PM (#43071516)

Literally, get over it. Even my (extremely conservative) church group doesn't have an issue with it. 1) because most people don't know BDSM terminology and 2) gimp has other connotations so it's not even obvious that was intended and 3) most people aren't terminally online and 100% don't care as long as the program works.

I've never had a problem sharing it. And no one outside tech has ever brought up BDSM when I tell them about the program or help them install it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by troyvit on Sunday February 16, 2025 @04:00PM (#43071656)

Eh. Where I work they probably wouldn't care about the BDSM aspects but they are pretty sensitive to ableist slurs, which is primarily why I recommend Photopea instead of GIMP when they need to do Photoshop-ish things.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by ryanmcbride on Sunday February 16, 2025 @10:33PM (#43074801)

The cool thing about life is that, we don't have to get over it. Instead we can advocate for change. And there's literally nothing you can do about it lol.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by veggieroll on Monday February 17, 2025 @12:07AM (#43075376)

Fork it then.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by ryanmcbride on Monday February 17, 2025 @11:28AM (#43080604)

Another cool thing about open source is that I can do that while still trying to affect change in the core repo :D

There's really no "shut up and go away" that you can give me that will work, because you aren't some grand FOSS arbiter, you're just some rando on the internet like me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by jrm4 on Monday February 17, 2025 @11:01AM (#43080284)

Sigh. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

An extremely conservative church group is perhaps the worst place to try to figure this out; y'all will self-censor naturally.

Anyway, I teach IT, in a department -- shared with Communications -- and can absolutely assure you that this name is a no-go. I get that people don't like "politics" and "optics" and such, but that's what's happening here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by enriquto on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @06:28AM (#43088362)

This is something that non-english speakers have long learned to live with. It is due time that everybody accepts that some words will sound funny to them. In french, for example, "bit" means "penis". This creates quite a stir when you teach computer science to kids. Yet nobody says that computer science is a no-go!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by veggieroll on Monday February 24, 2025 @03:16PM (#43164426)

I didn't say no-one gets upset by the name. I said that they're being silly gooses.

If your department wouldn't use free software because of the name, that's very much a them problem. And it's sad that they're so sensitive.

If you don't like the name, you don't have to use the software. Or fork it can call it something more anodyne to your sensibilities.

But no. You want everyone to cater to sensitive people. And thus, myself and others are here to say your comment is annoying when this comes up every thread that GIMP is mentioned.

[ Parent | on HN ]