News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by veggieroll on Sunday February 16, 2025 @01:52PM (#43070509)
That's probably true. But offending people with prudish attitudes or without a sense of humor is a pretty common old-school hacker goal.

It serves a valuable community function by protecting the community from corporate interests, non-technical bike-shedding, and overload by "bug" reports that are actually just the user not being technical enough to use the tool properly.

Edit: Also FWIW, I've had no problem introducing GIMP to church groups and in various professional settings.

Double edit: since you mention schools, I should also add that I taught my wife GIMP and she had no problem sharing it in her school (US public high school).

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by CharlesW on Sunday February 16, 2025 @02:56PM (#43071099)
> But offending people with prudish attitudes or without a sense of humor…

Some folks who are neither prudish or humorless want to see the project and its contributors succeed to the degree that alternatives like Photopea has, or as Blender has in the 3D space. The project will continue to limp along until the name is changed to something without negative connotations in English-speaking populations.

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by alexey-salmin on Sunday February 16, 2025 @03:57PM (#43071624)
You can fork it, rename to something like "Glimpse" and see the adoption skyrocket. Surely the success is just around the corner. Oh wait a minute
Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by gkbrk on Sunday February 16, 2025 @04:08PM (#43071725)
Hey don't be unfair to them, they also tried to collect donations for changing the name.
Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by CharlesW on Sunday February 16, 2025 @05:59PM (#43072657)
Point taken — the name is just one of many issues between GIMP and Blender-like success. But there are also open source projects like Inkscape, which enjoyed success in part because of a rechristening that eliminated the headwinds of previous bad names.
Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by talldayo on Sunday February 16, 2025 @03:13PM (#43071240)
The project will limp along regardless. If you want to see it succeed, you should stop repeating the same name non-issue and send patches instead. If it was truly a great program people wouldn't care what it was called.

Alternatively; fork the program yourself and change the name. It's not going to hit Blender levels of popularity overnight, but at least HN could sleep better knowing the name isn't an icky Folsom Street thing. It's getting tiring to open every GIMP changelog discussion and see people worried about Grandma's opinion on the software.

Re:Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin – Resources and Notes by troyvit on Sunday February 16, 2025 @03:58PM (#43071632)
> offending people with prudish attitudes or without a sense of humor is a pretty common old-school hacker goal

I agree, and to an extent laud it, but it also means keeping GIMP an old-school hacker project.