Better. I still feel like there's an element of explanations there nearly as opaque as "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors", but I can mostly forgive it. Clearly the review is written for someone already familiar with GIS terms. For example, "The geometry type represents spatial objects in a planar space using Cartesian geometry, assuming all calculations, including distance and area measurements, are performed on a flat surface." says nothing that couldn't be better stated as "this is for flat-projection maps, like the Mercator".