News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple v. Samsung: Surprises in Latest Court Documents.

Re:Apple v. Samsung: Surprises in Latest Court Documents by nirvana on Saturday July 28, 2012 @01:42PM (#4305989)
Hey Falling. You've been hellbanned. Your comments are not appearing to anyone except those who have "turn dead comments on". You may have been hellbanned for daring to defend Apple on HN, who knows since they never say, but they are really active at censoring people for having diverse opinions.

Just thought I'd share this in case you're still reading the thread... I can't even reply to your hellbanned comments alas.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple v. Samsung: Surprises in Latest Court Documents by nolok on Saturday July 28, 2012 @06:03PM (#4306656)
Banned for defending apple on hackernews ? Are you actually believing what you say ?

If anything, I would say this place is a little too full of apple fanboys, not the other way around. Get a grip on reality.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple v. Samsung: Surprises in Latest Court Documents by tl on Saturday July 28, 2012 @02:06PM (#4306054)
Looking at the comments, his last non-dead comment was 22 days ago. I don't see anything particular worthy of a ban though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple v. Samsung: Surprises in Latest Court Documents by weaksauce on Saturday July 28, 2012 @02:54PM (#4306156)
Maybe it was for another offense? Something like appearing like a voting bot? Maybe falling wrote a script that was scraping the site too quickly? I guess only pg or rtm know for sure.
[ Parent | on HN ]