Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting?

Re:Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting? by binary132 on Saturday February 15, 2025 @03:12AM (#43056813)

I had an absolutely terrible time today trying to get chatgpt to write me a very simple awk oneliner. It “thought” I was specifying a much more complicated requirement than I actually was.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting? by coder543 on Saturday February 15, 2025 @03:57AM (#43057050)

"ChatGPT" can mean many things... If you meant the free 4o-mini model, then yes, this outcome is not surprising, since it is bad at basically anything related to code.

If you meant the more powerful o1 or o3-mini models (great naming, openai...), then that outcome would be surprising.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting? by binary132 on Saturday February 15, 2025 @10:01AM (#43058957)

O1 Reasoning. You know, the feature you used to have to pay $200/mo for.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting? by coder543 on Saturday February 15, 2025 @10:07AM (#43059003)

o1 never cost $200/mo. That was o1-pro, which still isn’t available to Plus or Free users.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did Semgrep Just Get a Lot More Interesting? by binary132 on Sunday February 16, 2025 @11:31AM (#43069275)

whatever it is it’s the latest model and the hype is just not real.

[ Parent | on HN ]