News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We were wrong about GPUs by sanderjd on Friday February 14, 2025 @08:09PM (#43054825)
Really? There are plenty of valid criticisms of kubernetes, but this doesn't strike me as one of them. It gives you tons of control over all of this. That's a big part of why it's so complex!
Re:We were wrong about GPUs by sgarland on Friday February 14, 2025 @08:25PM (#43054938)
It gives you control via abstractions. That’s fine, and I like K8s personally, but if you don’t understand the underlying fundamentals that it’s controlling, you don’t understand what it’s doing.
Re:We were wrong about GPUs by jldugger on Friday February 14, 2025 @08:33PM (#43054969)
IMO, it's rather hard to fully know all of kubernetes and what it's doing, and the kind of person who demands elegance in solutions will hate it.
Re:We were wrong about GPUs by PaulHoule on Friday February 14, 2025 @08:35PM (#43054977)
This mainframe system from the 1990s was so much simpler

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cics-ts/6.x?topic=sysplex-parall...

even if it wasn't as scalable as Kube. One the other hand, a cluster of 32 CMOS mainframe could handle any commercial computing job that people were doing in the 1990s.

Re:We were wrong about GPUs by sanderjd on Friday February 14, 2025 @09:06PM (#43055166)
It's not simple but it's not opaque.
Re:We were wrong about GPUs by closewith on Saturday February 15, 2025 @08:05AM (#43058214)
Seems the causality is going the wrong direction there. Commercial jobs were limited by mainframe constraints, so that's where job sizes topped out.