Re:Doge.gov site has been hacked
by Swoerd on Friday February 14, 2025 @06:10AM
(#43047212)
They voted for Trump, how intelligent can they realistically be?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Go watch five minutes of Fox News and then ask yourself if treating the other side civilly is going to help.
Reasoned speech only works with people who are acting in good faith, and they aren’t.
Re:Doge.gov site has been hacked
by tastyfreeze on Friday February 14, 2025 @01:32PM
(#43051490)
Hahaha. The right says the same thing about the left. Being obstinate just increases polarization. What you are seeing happen right now is precisely because of the position you are taking. People have been pleading for decades to cut government spending. Trying to do it "the right way" hasn't worked. So now we are to "fuck it" if they won't work with us just tear it down and ask for forgiveness later.
Re:Doge.gov site has been hacked
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF on Friday February 14, 2025 @02:28PM
(#43052093)
This is not a reason to think that impassioned speech will have the impact you want. It may still be counter-productive. At any rate, those who are acting in good faith will recognize the well-reasoned arguments as such and perhaps start to wonder about the reasoning for their beliefs.
Re:Doge.gov site has been hacked
by orthecreedence on Friday February 14, 2025 @03:15PM
(#43052616)
> and they aren’t
This is an incredibly sweeping generalization. There are a lot of people who voted for Trump because of their perception of his merit/qualifications/plans vs Harris. Pretending they are all brainwashed simpletons not only alienates them but also sets up for future failures. There's a reason these people voted for him. What is that reason? Treating is as some temporary hysteria is just going to keep getting people like Trump (or worse) elected over and over.
I ask you to watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBQjC2iRll4
These people are insane. Conservatism needs to be officially recognized as a mental disorder.
Strongly disagree. Respectful discourse requires reciprocity and from Trump himself down to his supporters, that's deliberately absent in MAGA. The whole project is about dominating and putting down other people - and has been since day one - and only appealing to comity as a defensive or deflection tactic. With such a long track record of bad faith, it's foolish to engage with other postures than suspicion.
Thank you for your reply. I understand wanting to approach these conversations with suspicion. But I also think that MAGA is a heterogeneous movement whose participants have a range of motivations. Respectful speech doesn’t mean ignoring bad actors but refusing to label everyone that way. Some conversations with Trump voters can still be constructive. Respectful speech allows those conversations to happen. Conversely disrespectful speech contributes to polarization, effectively helping domination ideology to spread. That is why I believe it is counterproductive.