News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Former Employees' RSUs at Risk After Startup's IPO by csomar on Thursday February 13, 2025 @07:31AM (#43035231)
> So I believe the employer is required to do that withholding.

Sure but the withholding is the responsibility of the employer. In this case, shouldn't the employer cover it and send the shares - xx%?

Re:Ask HN: Former Employees' RSUs at Risk After Startup's IPO by kayo_20211030 on Thursday February 13, 2025 @07:36AM (#43035264)
The group are not employees. They're ex-employees. There is no employer relationship in this case. The responsibility for withholding is somewhere else.
Re:Ask HN: Former Employees' RSUs at Risk After Startup's IPO by abduhl on Thursday February 13, 2025 @10:35AM (#43036912)
I would be wary of assuming that is true for purposes of RSUs. Whether these folks and the company consider them current "employees" is not the employee-employer test for tax withholding purposes.
Re:Ask HN: Former Employees' RSUs at Risk After Startup's IPO by kayo_20211030 on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:40PM (#43040333)
I'm no expert - not even a talented amateur. But, RSU's for employees are equity, and RSU's for non-employees are expense. I'm assuming, because books must balance, that there's a similar split in tax (and responsibility for tax).
Re:Ask HN: Former Employees' RSUs at Risk After Startup's IPO by toast0 on Thursday February 13, 2025 @05:03PM (#43041978)
RSUs are wage income, and subject to supplemental wage withholding. The responsibility for wage withholding is with the payer.