News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by sebastiennight on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @11:53PM (#43032783)
This is a false dichotomy that ignores many other options than "giving itself its instructions or taking instructions from a person".

Examples include "instructions unclear, turned the continent to gray goo to accomplish the goal" ; "lost track mid-completion, spun out of control" ; "generated random output with catastrophic results" ; "operator fell asleep on keyboard, accidently hit wrong key/combination" ; etc.

If a system with write permissions is powerful enough, things can go wrong in many other ways than "evil person used it for evil" or "system became self-aware".

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by imtringued on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:01AM (#43033411)
Meanwhile back in reality most haywire AI is the result of C programmers writing code with UB or memory safety problems.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by sebastiennight on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:38PM (#43040308)
Whenever you think the timeline couldn't be any worse, just imagine a world where our AIs were built in JavaScript.