US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by wombatpm on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @05:39PM (#43030548)

Ok self flying drones that size if a deck of cards carrying a single bullet and enough processing power to fly around looking for faces, navigate to said face, fire when in range. Produce them by the thousands and release on the battlefield. Existing AI is more than capable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by dgfitz on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @05:44PM (#43030585)

You can do that without AI. Been able to do it for probably 7-10 years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by 20after4 on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @10:43PM (#43032455)

You can do that now, for sure, but I think it qualifies to call it AI.

If you don't want to call it AI, that's fine too. It is indeed dangerous and already here. Making the autonomous programmed behavior of said tech more powerful (and more complex), along with more ubiquitous, just makes it even more dangerous.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by imtringued on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:58AM (#43033392)

You don't need landmines to fly for them to be dangerous.

[ Parent | on HN ]