Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by eru on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @07:28AM
(#43024685)
I don't share your optimism.
Have a look at https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/20-breakthroughs-from-2... and keep in mind that those are those are already the highlights. The best they could come up with.
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by somenameforme on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @10:22AM
(#43026241)
What sort of things would you expect on the list? A lot of those are critical prerequisites for humanity's advancement. They also left out some really important stuff like studies on sex in space, exercise in space, effects of radiation in space (as well as hardening electronics), and so on.
A space station on Mars would probably not provide much more than that so should be a low priority, but obviously the discoveries to be made on land trounce those to be made in space.
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by eru on Friday February 14, 2025 @09:24PM
(#43055281)
> A lot of those are critical prerequisites for humanity's advancement. They also left out some really important stuff like studies on sex in space, exercise in space, effects of radiation in space (as well as hardening electronics), and so on.
Hardening electronics research can be done without pesky humans getting in the way. No need for the ISS.
All the other examples you mentioned are quite circular: humans in space help us research problems we only have because we are putting humans in space.
Sending a person there for a one way mission would probably give us more data than 100 probes. And I have a feeling that there are a lot of people willing to go on a such a mission.