Re:DeepScaleR: Surpassing O1-Preview with a 1.5B Model by Sc...
by jazzyjackson on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @05:21PM
(#43019114)
Nah, it takes a mastermind to be creative. The tiny models IME are good at following explicit instructions for data transformations (conforming to a JSON schema is especially helpful) but I wouldn't expect one to solve a problem I haven't already solved myself like how I use the .6T full size models.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DeepScaleR: Surpassing O1-Preview with a 1.5B Model by Sc...
by EE84M3i on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @05:25PM
(#43019157)
I thought conforming to a JSON schema was a solved problem for even the most garbage models by restricting the tokens it can generate?
Re:DeepScaleR: Surpassing O1-Preview with a 1.5B Model by Sc...
by jazzyjackson on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @08:35PM
(#43020763)
Yes that's what I mean, with a well described task and a JSON schema, the tiny models are suitable (though still hallucinatory - even llama3 7B was making up phone numbers when I tasked it with extracting contact details from email signature blocks)
I was pushing back against the parent's notion that tiny models would serve general purpose needs.