Again, "true" is not a synonym for "what I'd prefer."

Sure. Just like duopoly isn't a synonym for freedom. So, just because you'd apparently prefer that it be, that doesn't make it true.

I didn't say that, I said that talking about tyranny in this context is divorced from reality, and it is. I'm not even engaging with the "duopoly" thing, I know how hopeless a conversation like that. I just wish that people could represent their desires and complaints on this topic like rational adults.

> talking about tyranny in this context is divorced from reality, and it is

This is plain false, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duopoly#Characteristics_of_duo...

Do you understand how me saying "Tyranny" and you responding "Duopoly" isn't really a conversation or even debate? We're literally talking about different things.

edit Since this seems to need clarification: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tyranny

So what exactly do you mean by "Tyranny"? I mean that customers do not have a choice and can't affect the market, due to high entry barriers and the presence of monopoly elements.

Still, neither duopoly nor even monopoly really amount to "tyranny". When was the last time some duopolist threw you into a GULAG, or their death squads slaughtered people willy-nilly in the streets?

Stop misusing words like that. It debases them.