Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by spacemadness on Monday February 10, 2025 @05:53PM
(#43006343)
Also there isn’t anything that hasn’t been done before either in Balatro, it’s just a nice combination of deck builder tricks applied to poker. And the presentation is also well done which has nothing to do with the mechanics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by brookst on Monday February 10, 2025 @10:35PM
(#43008638)
I respectfully but totally disagree.
Balatro took the basic game mechanics of a very familiar game and said “what if they were dynamic”. The world’s a big place and I’m willing to believe it’s been done before… but I can’t think of one.
It’s the combination of familiar scoring mechanics with fun meta game modifiers that made Balatro so successful. What happens to poker if two of a kind is suddenly the most important hand? Or if not playing face cards leads to incrementally better scores every hand?
Again, I can’t claim it’s never been done, but saying it’s just another deck builder is missing the point.
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by ric2b on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @06:16AM
(#43011507)
Real time chess is a similar example of making a known game more dynamic and completely changing which positions are seen as strong or weak.
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by brookst on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @09:13AM
(#43012906)
Good analogy. Balatro goes a lot further by making the rules dynamic during the game, but at least categorically similar.
Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by spacemadness on Friday February 21, 2025 @11:54AM
(#43129848)
You just re-explained deck builders. Scoring modifiers can be part of their mechanics.