News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by throw0101d on Sunday February 09, 2025 @06:13PM (#42995113)
>> Did everybody already forget only a month ago it was revealed Chinese hackers had access to US Treasury computers including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's own?

> I find it strange that neither activists nor politicians nor journalists cared about that enough to make it a continuous news cycle.

Because (a) that was a month ago and that's a long time given recent events. And (b), it's implicit that someone 'inappropriate' having access is a bad thing, but with Trump/Musk/DOGE it's being done on purpose.

It's the purposeful part that's at issue now.

There are people who have reportedly just graduated high school that have root-level access to things:

* https://futurism.com/elon-kids-gutting-opm-doge

Beside being party loyalists, do they have any kind of qualifications?

Re: by an_guy on Sunday February 09, 2025 @08:55PM (#42996143)
Are you saying, a potus appointed commission for auditing government system is worse than a chinese backdoor in treasury department, who's level of access was unknown?
Re: by ordinaryradical on Sunday February 09, 2025 @09:40PM (#42996368)
No one invited the Chinese through the front door.

If you can’t understand that difference, you’re missing something very critical.

One is serious because a foreign adversary is compromising us; the other is serious because we are apparently designing the compromise ourselves via the whims of a demagogue.

Re: by ttpphd on Sunday February 09, 2025 @09:04PM (#42996186)
"if the president does it, it's not illegal" ok Nixon.
Re: by sangnoir on Monday February 10, 2025 @02:49AM (#42997850)
Cosigned by the Supreme Court of The United States, in 2024.
Re: by johnnyanmac on Monday February 10, 2025 @12:31AM (#42997234)
Yes. Someone without clearance nor congress approval running around with a sledgehammer is a lot more an immediate issue than a long term saboteur. We can deal with both, but let's make priorities.
Re: by throw0101d on Monday February 10, 2025 @08:13PM (#43007713)
> Are you saying, a potus appointed commission for auditing government system […]

You don't need read-write access for auditing. You don't need root/admin-level privileges.

Re: by an_guy on Monday February 10, 2025 @09:30PM (#43008295)
Do they really have write access though?

So far the only evidence of that is a wired article [1] with anonymous sources, even those source were not 100% sure about it.

Since then wired has posted another article [2] claiming the access have been revoked after announcements from senior officials, which again is from anonymous sources.

I'm really skeptical of these anonymous sources tbh.

[1] https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-associate-bfs-federal-...

[2] https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-department-doge-marko-e...

Re: by dani__german on Monday February 10, 2025 @10:30AM (#43001416)
I mean, Luke Farritor used some variety of AI to translate ancient scrolls and won an award for it:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-21-year-old-u...

Re: by throw0101d on Monday February 10, 2025 @08:29PM (#43007856)
> I mean, Luke Farritor used some variety of AI to translate ancient scrolls and won an award for it:

Did the ancient scrolls involved accounting ledgers? Because some kind of auditing experience would be useful to figure out how where Treasury or USAid payments went.

Re: by genewitch on Monday February 10, 2025 @01:49PM (#43003690)
Ageist and just parroting what the media says.

I'm surprised you didn't throw in jabs like "racist misogynistic eugenicist" like some reports...