Re:The Full Story of the FAA's Hiring Scandal
by galacticaactual on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:19AM
(#42950730)
A disabled person should probably not be manning ATC. And the language of ATC is English. Both of your points are irrelevant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Full Story of the FAA's Hiring Scandal
by healsdata on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @12:12PM
(#42951748)
Let's see. The OP didn't specify they were talking about the ATC, I gave two examples of ways you could de-anonimyze resumes in the normal application process; I'm sure there's others. And glad to hear you don't think people with cancer or those who use wheelchairs should be allowed to work at the ATC, I guess.
Re:The Full Story of the FAA's Hiring Scandal
by toast0 on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:41AM
(#42951115)
Many (or most) vision, hearing and speech impairments would likely be disqualifying for ATC; if they were to the point of needing accomidation during an interview. Mobility impairments would likely be able to be reasonably accomidated though; someone without use of their legs could work in an ATC facility that can be accessed without stairs, which would exclude some towers but not all of them. The workstation height may need to be adjustable as well, but that's not an unreasonable accomidation either.