S1: The $6 R1 Competitor?

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by mrshadowgoose on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @08:41AM (#42948339)

Here you go: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.11.623004v1

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by amelius on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @09:05AM (#42948621)

I'm not convinced. This is using the tooling and paradigms invented by humans.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by ninetyninenine on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @09:25AM (#42948858)

Science is a paradigm invented by humans. If a human uses this paradigm to invent something he is considered intelligent but if an ai uses it it’s not? All humans use human paradigms and they are intelligent.

If a human uses such a paradigm to success it is the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by amelius on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:03AM (#42949392)

Biology is a field where you can find new things relatively easily, if you follow existing protocols and do the hard lab work (which costs time and money).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by mrshadowgoose on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @08:51PM (#42958007)

Ah yes. I believe this is commonly called "moving the goalposts".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:S1: The $6 R1 Competitor? by amelius on Thursday February 06, 2025 @07:52AM (#42961852)

No it isn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]