I'll check it out. But the fact that it was mostly split along party lines says to me that they still have more loyalty to their party than branch

Too bad the bill had things unrelated to limiting the presidential power like

> requires a candidate for President or Vice President to provide copies of tax returns for the 10 most recent taxable years to the Federal Election Commission.

> establishes a program to support states and localities transition to ranked choice voting systems.

While things that I support, it frustrates me that congress can't propose bills that are hyper focused on one issue.

I don't think those line items would have made the difference either way. Until the turbo-filibuster we have today is curtailed, most legislation is DOA from the jump.

Congress has slowly abdicated its power to the other two branches of government over the decades. As a consequence, it's become more and more performative over time. This reality ends up changing the type of people who even seek high office in the first place. Legislators get replaced by social media influencers.

At this point, congress is primarily a judge appointment machine.

And civic institutions that actually want to get things done, adjust accordingly. They spend less time drafting bills and lobbying congress, and more time fighting for change through the courts or by lobbying the executive directly.

What are these riders called? Pork or something?

Pork Barrel is the term you're thinking of, but generally speaking that applies to spending that gets slapped onto unrelated bills, not necessarily to more general bloat like this stuff. Riders is probably the more accurate term