Anthropic: "Applicants should not use AI assistants"

Re:Anthropic: "Applicants should not use AI assistants" by imchillyb on Monday February 03, 2025 @07:46AM (#42917656)

There are LEOs that were prosecuted by states and the federal government for not taking action while children were being shot by another child.

LEOs are expected to take fire to protect civilians. Protect & Serve is their credo.

I wouldn’t trust LEOs to protect me, so I sure as hell fire am not trusting a low paid rent-a-cop to perform a similar duty.

Nope. I believe that my mindset is prevalent and not an outlier.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic: "Applicants should not use AI assistants" by plagiarist on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:51AM (#42918216)

I would trust a security guard more. They have consequences for misconduct or failure to do their job. (Assuming they aren't an on-duty LEO who is "overemployed.")

Not enough that I think they'd protect me in a situation that requires a gun. Just more than a cop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic: "Applicants should not use AI assistants" by lupire on Monday February 03, 2025 @11:28AM (#42919904)

A security guard's job is to act as a witness and deterrent, not to intervene to protect you.

Only a private bodyguard can be expected to fight for you.

Observe and Report.

[ Parent | on HN ]