Traditional ML is no stranger to measuring accuracy in terms of agreement with human evaluators.
A customer churn model or revenue forecast did have hard objective data (ground truth) to compare against - isn't it?
Re:Deep Research
by ptrrrrrrppr on Monday February 03, 2025 @05:14AM
(#42916750)
you seem to think all classical ML models were supervised, which isn't true. and we have metrics for unsupervised approaches as well
Now with LLMs it is what human evaluators feel about the LLM output?