News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on F-strings for C++26 proposal [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:F-strings for C++26 proposal [pdf] by dataflow on Sunday February 02, 2025 @10:21PM (#42914556)
constexpr in 11 vs 14 was night and day difference.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-strings for C++26 proposal [pdf] by anonnon on Sunday February 02, 2025 @11:20PM (#42914941)
constexpr "if" statements (C++20) are also a game-changer.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-strings for C++26 proposal [pdf] by boguscoder on Monday February 03, 2025 @12:49AM (#42915363)
Those are c++17
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-strings for C++26 proposal [pdf] by pjmlp on Monday February 03, 2025 @01:43AM (#42915619)
Initially, C++20 and C++23 extended its use cases, and combined with concepts is a pretty sweet spot for compile time metaprogramming without SFINAE or tag dispatch tricks.

Much better than having yet another syntax for macros.

[ Parent | on HN ]