News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by _delirium on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @10:43AM (#4291153)
A significant proportion of the "academic approach" is actually a third one: artificial intelligence is the analysis and implementation of rational decision-making. That approach tends to care neither about biological accuracy, nor believability in a Turing-test sense. Rather, it cares about whether its decisions are correct based on evidence available to the decision-maker. That's the kind of attitude you most often find in both statistical and logic-based AI circles.

Actually, Russell & Norvig's AI textbook has a nice summary of these different approaches to AI in its intro chapter.

Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by JabavuAdams on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @12:45PM (#4291754)
Too bad humans aren't rational.
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by _delirium on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @01:11PM (#4291903)
They aren't, but not all AI is aimed at mimicking human behavior. For example, if your goal is an AI system that can automatically control ship routing on the global Maersk shipping network (planning routes, rerouting to respond to contingencies, etc.), you might want "optimal" rather than "human-like" decision making.
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by JabavuAdams on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @02:00PM (#4292134)
Good point.