News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by debacle on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:48AM (#4290886)
They're still computers in the traditional sense - they only do what someone told them to do.
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by jan_g on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:50AM (#4290894)
I believe that you are then referring to sentience in addition to intelligence? Artificial sentient being is another thing entirely, I think. And tougher nut to crack :)
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by zumda on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:59AM (#4290938)
You are right, but to solve most problems, do machines really HAVE to think like humans?
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by zumda on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @10:08AM (#4290986)
(can't answer you directly, so I'm doing it here)

My point was, that, for example, language recognition doesn't need human intelligence, a statistical model is enough.

Or driving around a confined space only requires a particle filter, not human intelligence.

Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI by debacle on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:59AM (#4290945)
For most problems, you don't need AI.