Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI
by debacle on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:48AM
(#4290886)
They're still computers in the traditional sense - they only do what someone told them to do.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI
by jan_g on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:50AM
(#4290894)
I believe that you are then referring to sentience in addition to intelligence? Artificial sentient being is another thing entirely, I think. And tougher nut to crack :)
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI
by zumda on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @09:59AM
(#4290938)
You are right, but to solve most problems, do machines really HAVE to think like humans?
Re:Norvig vs. Chomsky and the Fight for the Future of AI
by zumda on Wednesday July 25, 2012 @10:08AM
(#4290986)
(can't answer you directly, so I'm doing it here)
My point was, that, for example, language recognition doesn't need human intelligence, a statistical model is enough.
Or driving around a confined space only requires a particle filter, not human intelligence.