Re:Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex
by femto on Friday January 31, 2025 @05:14PM
(#42892882)
"Independent" is more important than "opposite". I don't know that promptfoo would be overtly biased. Granted they might have unconscious bias or sensitivities about offending paying customers. I do note that they present all their evidence with methods and an invitation for others to replicate or extend their results, which would go someway towards countering bias. I wouldn't trust the neutrality of someone under the influence of the CCP over promptfoo.
Re:Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex
by teeth-gnasher on Friday January 31, 2025 @08:17PM
(#42894612)
We’ll see soon enough, no use debating now. But I’d put money on them not showing any examples that might get them caught up in a media frenzy regarding whether they’re x-ist or anti-x-ic or anything of the sort, regardless of what the underlying ground truth in their specific questions might be.
You’ll note even on this platform, generally regarded as open and pseudo-anonymous, only a single relevant example has been put forward.
Re:Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex
by cscurmudgeon on Friday January 31, 2025 @09:51PM
(#42895179)
Somethings never change. Reminds me of this joke from Regan:
Two men, an American and a Russian were arguing. One said,
“in my country I can go to the white house walk to the president's office and pound the desk and say "Mr president! I don't like how you're running things in this country!"
"I can do that too!"
"Really?"
"Yes! I can go to the Kremlin, walk into the general secretary's office and pound the desk and say, Mr. secretary, I don't like how Reagan is running his country!"
It would be far more interesting to get the opposite party’s perspective.