Most of the public is also unfamiliar with the term open source, and I'm not sure they did themselves any favors by picking one that invites far more questions and needs for explanation. In that sense, it may have accomplished little but its harmful effects.

I get your overall take is "this is just how things go in language", but you can escalate that non-caring perspective all the way to entropy and the heat death of the universe, and I guess I prefer being an element that creates some structure in things, however fleeting.

> Most of the public is also unfamiliar with the term open source

I’d argue otherwise. (Familiar with, not know.) Particularly in policy circles.

> picking one that invites far more questions and needs for explanation

There wasn't ever a debate. And now, not even the OSI demands training data. (It couldn’t. It, too, would be ignored.)