DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source

Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source by mohsen1 on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @11:18AM (#42866896)

if you publish only the binary it's not open source

if open the source then it is open source

if you write a book/blog about how you came up with the ideas but didn't publish the source it's not open source, even if you publish the blog+binaries

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source by mistercheph on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @12:45PM (#42868401)

model weights != binaries

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source by fragmede on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @02:12PM (#42869665)

why not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source by jay_kyburz on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @03:26PM (#42870703)

Its like the image you generated in Photoshop released as creative commons, not the Photoshop source code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DeepSeek proves the future of LLMs is open-source by fragmede on Wednesday January 29, 2025 @03:33PM (#42870775)

that adds to model weights == binaries tho

[ Parent | on HN ]