News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Effective Go by krakensden on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @01:14PM (#4286687)
Is there some reason documentation on the Golang website has 57 upvotes?
Re:Effective Go by melling on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @01:39PM (#4286874)
If I had to guess, it's because people are quite excited about the language and they're interested in giving it some visibility. There's always lots of new technologies, but very few gain wide adoption.
Re:Effective Go by sp332 on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @02:59PM (#4287356)
A page of examples of the Zen of Python got almost 200 upvotes. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2203101 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3697378
Re:Effective Go by zoul on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @02:17PM (#4287117)
I enjoy the pragmatic reasoning behind the documented choices. It's an interesting input even if I don't work in Go.
Re:Effective Go by usea on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @02:47PM (#4287288)
It's more of a "best practices" than it is documentation. In the vein of Effective C++ by Scott Meyers. It's well-written, informative and interesting. Definitely one of the best resources on Go I've come across.
Re:Effective Go by pasbesoin on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @01:59PM (#4287010)
There is a collection programming books titled "Effective X", for language X. From multiple publishers, IIRC, though I think it may have started with Addison Wesley.

The majority of those books with which I'm familiar have pretty good if not excellent reputations.

I would suggest that this documentation's title may be acknowledging this, and perhaps -- deliberately or not -- leveraging it.

EDIT: No, maybe it was indeed O'Reilly. E.g. Effective C and Effective C++.