Good thing that is part of the wikipedia entry:

> Any piece of digital information is representable as a number; consequently, if communicating a specific set of information is illegal in some way, then the number may be illegal as well.

All those things are not self-evident and thus debatable

> not self-evident and thus debatable

Totally agree. But prompting debate or even further thought isn’t the point of the meme.

I'd argue that, as satire, it's the main point ;)

> as satire, it's the main point

There is thought-stopping satire and thought-provoking satire. Much of it depends on the context. I’m not getting the latter from a “USA land of the ‘free’” comment.