Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by jmtulloss on Saturday January 10, 2009 @06:20PM
(#428516)
We can take the space elevator to work!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by gravitycop on Saturday January 10, 2009 @06:32PM
(#428532)
It is 22,300 miles to GEO. At 100 mph, a trip to or from GEO would take 223 hours, or 9 days.
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by jmtulloss on Saturday January 10, 2009 @06:34PM
(#428533)
I guess we should go a bit faster then.
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by gravitycop on Saturday January 10, 2009 @06:39PM
(#428538)
For faster travel, rockets tend to be chosen. What, then, would be the point of a space elevator?
By the way, the top recorded speed of a Bugatti Veyron, the fastest production car in the world, is 253 mph - on the flat. Travelling vertically at that speed, a space elevator car (we might assume it is powered by a 1%-efficient laser-beam stationed on the ground and aimed at photovoltaic panels on the bottom of the elevator car) would take 88 hours (or 3.7 days) to get to GEO.
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by jmtulloss on Saturday January 10, 2009 @07:47PM
(#428591)
Haha, it's ok, it was a joke.
Thanks for doing the math though :).
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by aardvarkious on Saturday January 10, 2009 @09:33PM
(#428697)
I could see humans taking rockets while all non-perishable cargo takes the elevator.
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by swombat on Sunday January 11, 2009 @07:44AM
(#429095)
Last I heard it costs some $20,000 per pound to send material up in a space shuttle. I think this would be beyond most people's commuting allowance!
Re:Why I thought we'd all be living in space by now
by gravitycop on Sunday January 11, 2009 @07:51AM
(#429099)
The Space Shuttle is not LEO on the cheap. The Sea Dragon does a lot better (as low as $8.90/lb, in 1963 dollars).
http://www.dunnspace.com/leo_on_the_cheap.htm