It's very cool to be able to have access to such a high horsepower machine from anywhere though. Next step is figuring out the networking interface to be able access the host GPU/ollama API from pods running in a Colima VM/k3s cluster setup.
Very funny. How does the 70B model do in comparison?
bash> ollama run hf.co/unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF:Q5_K_M
(It wouldn't accept the Q_8 because it was sharded.)
Will report back lol
What app do you use on your phone to access your home LLM servers over tailscale?
bash> ollama run hf.co/unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF:Q5_K_M
pulling manifest
...
success
>>> Tell me a "what's the difference between" joke about techbros and another funny comparison of your choosing
<think>
Okay, so I need to come up with a "What's the difference between" joke comparing techbros and another group. Hmm. Let me think.
First, what defines a techbro? They're usually associated with startups, tech gadgets, maybe working in Silicon Valley, into things like crypto, NFTs, and they often have a certain lingo or way of
dressing—like hoodies, jeans, maybe beanies. They might be seen as overly optimistic about their ideas changing the world but sometimes disconnected from practical realities.
Now, I need another group to compare them with. Maybe something else in tech but different enough to create humor. Let's think: developers? No, too similar. Maybe hipsters? Or perhaps venture capitalists?
Wait, what about "developers who actually ship code"? That could work because it plays on the idea that while techbros talk a lot about their ideas, developers are more focused on delivering actual
products.
So the joke structure is usually two lines: one for each group, highlighting a key difference. It needs to be punchy and capture the essence of both groups in a humorous way.
Let me draft it:
"What's the difference between a techbro and a developer who actually ships code?"
"Techbros are still explaining their MVP to you three years later, while developers just sent you a pull request titled 'it works now'."
Wait, does that make sense? Let me break it down. A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is something techbros often talk about but might take forever to actually build or ship. On the other hand, developers who
are focused on shipping code would just send a pull request indicating they've fixed something and it's done now.
I think that captures the difference between all talk and actual action. It's relatable for people in the tech industry who know the dynamics between idea people and implementers.
Is there another angle? Maybe comparing them to something else, like entrepreneurs or investors, but I think the developer angle is solid because it directly contrasts talking about ideas versus executing
them.
So the final answer would be that joke. It highlights the techbro's tendency to over-explain without delivery, while developers focus on getting things done.
</think>
**What's the difference between a techbro and a developer who actually ships code?**
*Techbros are still explaining their MVP to you three years later, while developers just sent you a pull request titled "it works now."*
This joke humorously contrasts the tendency of techbros to focus on ideas and discussions with the action-oriented approach of developers who deliver tangible results.Ouch
Personally, I like to see the thought processes.
It's a terminal emulator
Pasting the logic for anyone interested:
<details type="reasoning" done="true" duration="102"> <summary>Thought for 102 seconds</summary> > Okay, so I need to figure out what the tallest peak in California is. Hmm, I remember that the highest mountain in the contiguous United States is Mount Whitney, but wait, isn't that in California? Let me think. Yes, I'm pretty sure it's in California. But maybe there are other tall peaks too. > > Wait, no, Mount Whitney is definitely the tallest. It's over 14,000 feet. But sometimes people might confuse it with other mountains like Shasta or something else. Oh, wait, isn't Mount Shasta also a volcano? I think that's in California too but it's not as tall as Whitney. > > So, putting it together, Mount Whitney is the tallest peak in California at 14,505 feet. It's located in the Sierra Nevada range. People hike there a lot because it's such a high point. But I should double-check to make sure I'm not mixing up anything else. Yeah, that seems right. > I wonder if there are any taller peaks elsewhere. Oh, Denali in Alaska is higher, but that's not in California. So within the state, Whitney is the highest. Got it. > So the answer is Mount Whitney at 14,505 feet above sea level. It's a popular spot for hikers and climbers. Makes sense because it's such an iconic peak in the Sierra Nevada mountains. > I think I've got all that right. No other peaks in California are taller than Whitney. So yeah, Mount Whitney is the tallest. > Just to make sure, sometimes there are different names or maybe alternate names for peaks, but Whitney is pretty straightforward. Yeah, it's definitely the one. > Okay, so I'm confident now. The answer is Mount Whitney. > *Final Answer* > The tallest peak in California is Mount Whitney, with an elevation of 14,505 feet above sea level. > > \boxed{Mount Whitney} </details> To determine the tallest peak in California, we consider notable mountains such as Mount Whitney and Mount Shasta. Mount Whitney is recognized as the highest peak in the contiguous United States, standing at 14,505 feet. It is located in the Sierra Nevada mountain range and is a popular destination for hikers. Mount Shasta, although also a significant peak, does not surpass Whitney's elevation. Therefore, the tallest peak in California is confirmed to be Mount Whitney.
*Final Answer* The tallest peak in California is \boxed{Mount Whitney}.