Re:Can you read this cursive handwriting? The National Archi...
by t1amat on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:19PM
(#42749789)
For me, the first sentence was almost immediately readable, I just had to slow down a bit to decipher the name
Re:Can you read this cursive handwriting? The National Archi...
by ggddv on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:20PM
(#42749792)
I’ve found much of the “reading” of cursive of my teachers was just basically snobbery. If it’s illegible but curly, well I just read it wrong! Illegible but straight, you makes it wrong!
Re:Can you read this cursive handwriting? The National Archi...
by TheRealPomax on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:36PM
(#42749908)
They're not "meant to be hard", they're just normal texts. The question is literally "can you read this?" because if you can: "Cool! Want to help transcribe it because the constraining factor when it comes to digitizing cursive is literally how many humans we can get to help out".
Re:Can you read this cursive handwriting? The National Archi...
by cvoss on Saturday January 18, 2025 @01:03PM
(#42750086)
Someone with practice at reading old cursive would likely be able to read a sample such as this one at least at a pace suitable for reading aloud. An expert, of course, could do it as fast as if it were their "native" script.
Here is an example of a non-expert compared to an expert reading aloud [0].
I learned cursive in school in the early 2000s, but I could never read my grandmother's handwriting. Whenever she mailed me a card, I would have to have my mom read it to me.
It took about one minute to decipher the first sentence in the sample. Is that considered good these days?