Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by jrflowers on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:00AM
(#42746897)
What? If you do not like the pig the app also has live streams of people cutting their own bangs. Something for everyone!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by wruza on Saturday January 18, 2025 @09:35AM
(#42748637)
I know you’re joking, but this is not true. There’s something short and stupid for everyone, but not something interesting for everyone at all.
Last couple years I spent my media time watching trackmania and noita for the most part. These are just-games, but with rich interesting worlds behind them. I can’t imagine spending all this time watching a pig or people cutting bangs or someone lipsyncing or talking nonsense. Not judging, but it’s such mind disgracing activity in my view.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by neaden on Saturday January 18, 2025 @12:36PM
(#42749903)
"Not judging, but it’s such mind disgracing activity in my view." Just because you say not judging doesn't mean you are not judging.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by wruza on Saturday January 18, 2025 @03:07PM
(#42751022)
Sometimes it’s hard to discern the line between judging and sharing a personal opinion, because even an opinion may hurt.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by jrflowers on Saturday January 18, 2025 @03:46PM
(#42751285)
To reiterate the post you are responding to, saying “not judging” doesn’t make a statement not a judgment in the same way that saying “sharing a personal opinion” doesn’t make a statement not a judgment. “What you enjoy doing is a mind disgracing activity” is a judgment, full stop, regardless of how nonsensical of a statement it is or how you dress it up or qualify it.
That aside I looked up trackmania and lmao