Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by kelseyfrog on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:40AM
(#42738756)
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but everyone has different interests from everyone else. That's not a sufficient reason.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by zeroonetwothree on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:47AM
(#42738903)
You are free to have that our opinion but our elected government disagrees with you. It’s not the job of the court to adjust laws based on personal preference of HN commenters.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by yard2010 on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:33AM
(#42739834)
Yes but there are Reagan's interests and Hitler's interests. You have no choice but to pick the lesser evil.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f...
by kelseyfrog on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:42AM
(#42739981)
Sorry, While I understand that there are degrees of interest misalignment, I'm not sure what Hitler's interests refers to in this context. Hitler is deceased so it's unlikely his interests are relevant in a discussion about TikTok.