News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Workaccount2 on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:33AM (#42738613)
The US occupies a new office downtown. China wants eyes on a specific room, and the choice spot for monitoring it is someone else's apartment. This person happens to own a bakery also in town, and it sort of seems like the apartment is a reach for them as it is.

Now in your feed you get a short showing some egregious findings in the food from this bakery. More like this crop up from the mystical algorithmic abyss. You won't go there anymore. Their reviews tank and business falls. Mind you those posts were organic, tiktok just stifled good reviews and put the bad ones on blast.

6 months later the apartment is on the market, and not a single person in town "has ever seen CCP propaganda on tiktok".

This is the overwhelmingly main reason why Tiktok is getting banned.

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by itishappy on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:37AM (#42738678)
Why just TikTok? Are American corporations immune from coveting thy neighbor's possessions?
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by dralley on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:39AM (#42738735)
For the same reason Grindr was forced to sell to a non-Chinese parent, the risks of putting some apps / information in the hands of strategic competitors is too high. If a domestic company tried to blackmail people with their sexual history, they face domestic legal accountability. China does not.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by tptacek on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:41AM (#42738789)
Jurisprudentially? Yes.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by tmnvdb on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:44AM (#42738834)
Why is "The Chinese Communist Part is more dangerous than Meta sharholders" such a hard thing to grasp?
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by johnnyanmac on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:47AM (#42738896)
Because Facebook destabilized our nation in 8 years far more than any claims of modern CCP wrongdoings to the US.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Workaccount2 on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:01AM (#42739199)
Now imagine what would have happened if Facebook was owned by Russia.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by itishappy on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:56AM (#42739091)
Why should it be? What does ByteDance want that isn't also valuable to Facebook?
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by tmnvdb on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:44AM (#42740021)
The destabilization of the United States and the end of it's status as the worlds richest and most powerful country?
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Workaccount2 on Friday January 17, 2025 @11:14AM (#42739445)
Facebook is a company owned by public shareholders.

ByteDance is an arm of the Chinese Communist Party.

What facebook and ByteDance want at their core are very different things.

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Hasu on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:58AM (#42739124)
Is it more dangerous? Facebook has done more harm to the average American than the Chinese Communist Party has.

More dangerous to the US government? Yes, that's true.

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by cwillu on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:35AM (#42738649)
What in the tinfoil hat of god…
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by hb-robo on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:35AM (#42738652)
> This is the overwhelmingly main reason why Tiktok is getting banned.

Because people are writing Orwell fanfiction?

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by thomquaid on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:37AM (#42738696)
Do you have any evidence at all or just fear, uncertainty, and doubt?
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by wormlord on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:42AM (#42738798)
That's an interesting hypothetical, I have another one.

Imagine you're a country with natural resources. Private industries want those resources. Suddenly the US media is flooded with fabricated or exaggerated stories about the country written by NGOs and Think Tanks. Suddenly, out of nowhere a coup happens in the country with the stated intention of "liberalization" and "democratic reforms". The country goes through shock therapy and structural adjustments as it takes on mountains of IMF loans to enter the world markets-- it has to sell off control of all its national resources and industries to American companies. The life expectancy plummets.

Oh wait this isn't a hypothetical this is just actual US foreign policy.

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by selimthegrim on Friday January 17, 2025 @03:16PM (#42742802)
South Korea seems to have done fine.
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by Joker_vD on Friday January 17, 2025 @10:36AM (#42738659)
I cannot tell if this comment was made seriously or as a satire of unhinged conspiracy theories.