News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starship Flight 7 by walrus01 on Thursday January 16, 2025 @06:24PM (#42732236)
That's for sure not stage separation, that's an explosion from the FTS rupturing the ship tanks.
Re:Starship Flight 7 by ericcumbee on Thursday January 16, 2025 @07:09PM (#42732587)
If it was the FTS wouldn't the flight control systems send a message back to the ground saying "things are going sideways here, FTS Activated"
Re:Starship Flight 7 by anothertroll456 on Thursday January 16, 2025 @09:15PM (#42733353)
Maybe it did, or is it public that it didn't? A possible sequence (very typical in rocket failures) is: fire, engine failure(s), loss of control, rupture due to aero forces or FTS activation, explosion due to propellant mixture. Not all of these have to happen, but it's a typical progression. Before the days of AFTS the FTS activation would be pretty delayed.
Re:Starship Flight 7 by pixl97 on Thursday January 16, 2025 @06:28PM (#42732272)
Eh I'm thinking more it was a reentry explosion from pressurized tanks. Engines had failed a while before then.
Re:Starship Flight 7 by s1artibartfast on Thursday January 16, 2025 @06:39PM (#42732363)
This is over the Bahamas. Re-entry was much further east, near Turks and Caicos Islands.

Also, if a pressurized tank is reentering, that means the FTS failed to detonate.