News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by lumb63 on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @07:20PM (#42719228)
A lot of folks in child comments are echoing your sentiment that something “cannot be proved safe”. Your argument that proving something is “not unsafe” is proving a negative is fallacious; the same can literally be said about anything (proving something is X is the same as proving it is not not-X). Proving drugs are safe and effective is literally one of the jobs of the FDA. If you do not believe that is possible, then we may as well tear down the entire drug regulatory apparatus. I imagine you and many other commenters will sing a different tune when posed with that suggestion.

So, let’s stop pretending it’s not possible. We require drug companies show their products are safe and efficacious, and there is both a scientific and a legal framework by which we do this. Let’s debate whether or not the same framework should be applied to food additives (I would argue it should) rather than claim it is not possible.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by Aloisius on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @08:10PM (#42719692)
"Safe" for the FDA means the benefits outweigh the potential risks, not safe in absolute terms.

If the FDA actually required every drug to be proven safe at any dose for everyone, we'd have no modern drugs.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by refurb on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @09:34PM (#42720348)
We require drug companies show their products are safe and efficacious, and there is both a scientific and a legal framework by which we do this.

We don’t do this.

What the FDA requires is acceptable safety in light of the benefit provided.

The FDA approves highly toxic drugs all the time. Including ones with the risk of death. I don’t think anyone would call chemotherapy “safe”.